You’re right. I think it needs some discussion before it’s incorporated into the library. It’s a pretty big feature and I’ve had it floating around in my head for quite a while now. I’m sure we’ll both have a lot of ideas to bring to the table.
I noticed you already submitted a PR to discuss the code. I think that’s a good idea. There’s only so much we can talk about with a high level design. It’s the type of thing we’ll need to play with and iterate on. I suspect we’ll refactor the API a few times before pulling it into the main branch.
I get it. The documentation is lacking. Everyone likes to complain about it but nobody likes to write it 
We have made a start on the wiki and there’s quite a few demos in the repository. You can of course ask questions here or various other places.
Rest assured, I’m completely aware of the documentation issues and I’d like to improve the situation. Better documentation means I spend less time answering questions and more time working on new features. That’s a win for everyone. Unfortunately, writing good documentation takes a lot of time and I’ve only got a limited about of that.
Thanks. I appreciate it. Our library is currently only focused on 2D and you’re appears to be mostly 3D but I’m sure we can get a few ideas from it.